<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://propwiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=VivianHambleton</id>
	<title>PropWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://propwiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=VivianHambleton"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://propwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/VivianHambleton"/>
	<updated>2026-10-22T10:10:42Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.36.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://propwiki.org/index.php?title=Turn_FAQ_Answers_Into_A_Keep,_Reject,_Or_Pending_Checklist&amp;diff=59078</id>
		<title>Turn FAQ Answers Into A Keep, Reject, Or Pending Checklist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://propwiki.org/index.php?title=Turn_FAQ_Answers_Into_A_Keep,_Reject,_Or_Pending_Checklist&amp;diff=59078"/>
		<updated>2026-10-22T03:18:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VivianHambleton: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Convert FAQ answers into three decision states. Keep options that meet must-have scent criteria, reject those that clearly fail them, and leave uncertain cases pending. Nice-to-have preferences should remain separate from missing evidence so the [https://kb.smds.us/index.php/User:SolGtm8346591 Parent Resource] comparison stays transparent.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VivianHambleton</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://propwiki.org/index.php?title=Turn_FAQ_Answers_Into_A_Keep,_Reject,_Or_Pending_Checklist&amp;diff=59072</id>
		<title>Turn FAQ Answers Into A Keep, Reject, Or Pending Checklist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://propwiki.org/index.php?title=Turn_FAQ_Answers_Into_A_Keep,_Reject,_Or_Pending_Checklist&amp;diff=59072"/>
		<updated>2026-10-22T03:06:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;VivianHambleton: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Convert FAQ answers into three decision states. Keep options that meet must-have scent criteria, reject those that clearly fail them, and leave uncertain cases pending. Nice-to-have preferences should remain separate from missing evidence so the [https://Kb.Smds.us/index.php/User:MelvinMackennal Parent resource] comparison stays transparent.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VivianHambleton</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>